Jul 15, 2011 9:00 PM

Gallery: Contraceptive Comeback: The Maligned IUD Gets a Second Chance

01
ff-iud-f
__Mirena__ __2001-present__ When the Mirena first hit the US market, so few women were using IUDs that many doctors didn't even know how to insert them. Today, the devices are recognized as safe, and 2 million US women have a Mirena. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University
02
ff-iud7-f
__Paragard__ __1988-present__ Available starting in 1988, the ParaGard had sluggish sales throughout the 1990s. It's more popular now—possibly because it's the only copper IUD sold in the US and it's considerably cheaper than its hormone- releasing competitor. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Teva Women's Health, INC.

03
ff-iud6-f
__Gynekoil 1960-early 1970__ Also known as the Margulies Spiral or the Perma Spiral, the Gynekoil was the first plastic IUD in the US. The rigid tail was meant to make it easier for women to check that the device was in place, but it also caused pain for male partners. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University
04
ff-iud5-f
__Lippes Loop 1964-1986__ Before the Dalkon Shield, this was the most popular IUD on the US market. But manufacturer Ortho Pharmaceutical stopped selling it, which inventor Jack Lippes blamed on poor sales and fallout from the Dalkon Shield debacle. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University

05
ff-iud4-f
__Cu-7 1974-1986__ The Dalkon Shield wasn't the only IUD to spur lawsuits. The Cu-7 ("Cu" is copper), made by Monsanto subsidiary G. D. Searle, caused problems as well. It was linked to ectopic pregnancy, perforation of the uterus, and pelvic inflammation. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University
06
ff-iud3-f
__Saf-t-coil__ __1965-1984__ One of the oldest IUDs, the Saf-T-Coil was also one of the least expensive and easiest and safest to insert (a strawlike inserter minimized contamination). But by 1982, the device only had 5 percent of the IUD market and the maker killed it. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University

07
ff-iud2-f
__Dalkon Shield 1971-1974__ The clawlike appendages that kept the Dalkon Shield in place made removal painful and could perforate the uterus. The Shield also caused cases of pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and spontaneous septic abortion. Photo: Jamie Chung; IUD Courtesy of Dittrick Medical History Center and Museum/Case Western Reserve University

Review: Apple iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max | Camera

The iPhone 18 Pro Is for the Shutterbugs

Fun camera features help make these candy bar iPhones stand out from the dazzle of the folding iPhone Duo.

Julian Chokkattu

Don’t Buy an Android Phone Until You Read Our Guide

Shopping for a phone can be an ordeal. That’s why we’ve tested almost every Android phone, from the smartest to the cheapest—even phones that fold—to find the ones worth your money.

Julian Chokkattu

Introducing the WIRED App

The app is the best way to read, watch, and listen to WIRED’s journalism.

WIRED Staff

Hackers Got Inside a Flock Camera. Its Data Shows How the System Really Works

A hacker collective pulled down a Flock camera and dumped its data. The files included thousands of videos and logs showing that the device captured 1.6 million images of 50,000 vehicles in 21 days.

Dhruv Mehrotra

The EU Plans to Ban Social Media For Under-13s

The bloc wants to curb Big Tech’s grip on children with its new EU KIDS ACTS, but age checks, parental oversight, and privacy concerns could make its plan difficult to implement.

Isabella Ward

I Made Robot Vacuums Clean Up Cherry Juice and Cheerios. These Won

My hands-on tests reveal which models can scrub stains, reach difficult corners, and navigate a chaotic home.

Nena Farrell

How Self-Driving Cars Might Change Crash Testing Forever

Lie down in a car, and you’re more likely to get seriously hurt in a crash. But a driverless future is forcing governments to revisit long-standing safety issues.

Aarian Marshall