*I'm kind of taking this guy's point about the crushing economic factors here, but I don't understand why these online educationaly enterprises even need to *pretend* to be a "college." If we're really looking at Clayton Christensen style "disruption," we ought to be abandoning the whole idea of "education," of degrees, schooling, grades, papers, publishing, theses, doctorates, any of that.
*You just get on line and you start messing with stuff. At some point, the other practitioners notice you and start linking to you. And they buy stuff from you, or they praise you for what you are doing. And then you know that you know it. And that's an end to it.
*Maybe somebody could invent some formal tests for you, if they were all worried about it. Otherwise, what the heck: bring on the rocket-science and the brain surgery! Got all the instructables you can eat!
*Of course we're not "formally educated," but given that we're living in a re-purposed car showroom in some wildfire-flaming barrio in East Los Angeles, who cares about that? You can't *make us* care. You are Main Stream Education and you are so over.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/college_guide/feature/college_for_99_a_month.php
(...)
"In recent years, Americans have grown accustomed to living amid the smoking wreckage of various once-proud industries—automakers bankrupt, brand-name Wall Street banks in ruins, newspapers dying by the dozen. It’s tempting in such circumstances to take comfort in the seeming permanency of our colleges and universities, in the notion that our world-beating higher education system will reliably produce research and knowledge workers for decades to come. But this is an illusion. Colleges are caught in the same kind of debt-fueled price spiral that just blew up the real estate market. They’re also in the information business in a time when technology is driving down the cost of selling information to record, destabilizing lows.
"In combination, these two trends threaten to shake the foundation of the modern university, in much the same way that other seemingly impregnable institutions have been torn apart. In some ways, the upheaval will be a welcome one. Students will benefit enormously from radically lower prices—particularly people like Solvig who lack disposable income and need higher learning to compete in an ever-more treacherous economy. But these huge changes will also seriously threaten the ability of universities to provide all the things beyond teaching on which society depends: science, culture, the transmission of our civilization from one generation to the next...."
